http://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspxmathnetnumerics Reviews Rss Descriptionhttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/98245#ReviewBy-drewnoakesRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - A fantastic open source project that fills a void for .NET with a variety of options. Documentation is a bit too light, but it seems that the project is currently quite active.drewnoakesMon, 14 Jan 2013 15:36:35 GMTReviewed: Math.NET Numerics v2.3.0 (Jan 14, 2013) 20130114033635Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-ahellwigRated 2 Stars (out of 5) - Homepage, download page, documentation... everything seems to be so outdated and unmaintainedahellwigTue, 07 Aug 2012 12:32:42 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Aug 07, 2012) 20120807123242Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-nrollandRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - I can't rate it before I download it so dont pop up that freaking window now, morons.nrollandSun, 11 Mar 2012 13:31:29 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Mar 11, 2012) 20120311013129Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-FabioRavanelliRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Great job! Thanks guys!FabioRavanelliSun, 11 Dec 2011 15:03:05 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Dec 11, 2011) 20111211030305Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-lcdosRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Congratulations, on the Beta 2. Great work indeed. Yet we may need more instructions on how to build the native wrappers.lcdosMon, 18 Apr 2011 12:55:52 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Apr 18, 2011) 20110418125552Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-lcdosRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Congratulations, on the Beta 2. Great work indeed.lcdosMon, 18 Apr 2011 12:26:28 GMTReviewed: Beta 2 (Apr 18, 2011) 20110418122628Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-dondestasmanuRated 4 Stars (out of 5) - I am particularly impressed by the reactivity of the developers to explain their choices in implementation and fix identified issues. The only reason I'm not giving it a 5 star is the current lack of documentation, which I'm sure will be addressed in the future. Thumbs up!dondestasmanuWed, 06 Apr 2011 15:53:41 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (Apr 06, 2011) 20110406035341Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-EntraX666Rated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Good job guys !EntraX666Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:47:56 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (janv. 30, 2011) 20110130044756Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-rememberRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Ok, very wellrememberWed, 22 Dec 2010 08:10:26 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (дек 22, 2010) 20101222081026Ahttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-rememberRated 4 Stars (out of 5) - Ok, very wellrememberWed, 22 Dec 2010 08:09:56 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (дек 22, 2010) 20101222080956Ahttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-lcdosRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Congratulations, and you guys ROCK!!!!!lcdosMon, 29 Nov 2010 14:44:57 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (Nov 29, 2010) 20101129024457Phttp://mathnetnumerics.codeplex.com/releases/view/56448#ReviewBy-isklRated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Glad to hear the release news,wish Math.NET Numerics to be another masterpieceisklFri, 26 Nov 2010 14:32:24 GMTReviewed: Beta 1 (十一月 26, 2010) 20101126023224P