
Hi all,
Some remarks on the API now. I think it may be possible to simplify it. It's only mere questions I asked myself when using the API, maybe there are not relevant, stupid, or not applicable because of some other constraints I don't know, so do not take them
as wishes but only as mere remarks from a mere user that is used to use Matlab.
There are in my opinion to many kinds of matrices (DenseMatrix, SparseMatrix, DenseVector, SparseVector...).
I think that 99.99% of times a DenseMatrix is selected, and I also think that most people do not even know what is a Sparse Matrix. You could simplify the API by assuming a matrix is always "dense", except if the user explicitly ask for a Sparse
Matrix (e.g. a flag "IsSparse" in the constructor, with default value false).
Having a separate class for vector is also disturbing : is it a row vector, a column vector ? Would it not be possible to have a single class for matrices and vectors ?
Matrix / Vector classes have a lot of methods. Would it make sense to implement the "algorithmic methods" in a sepate static class ? This is how it is done in ILNumerics and also (in a way) in Matlab, i.e. instead of writing : mat2 = mat1.Inverse()
we would write mat2 = Inverse(mat1). It would simplify the Matrix class, and it may also be simpler on an implementation point of view, because you could write a single implementation of methods which are common to matrices and vectors (for example,
there is no Sum() method for Matrix, only for Vector, but on Matlab using sum() on a Matrix returns a vector where each element is the sum of the columns, and sum(sum(mat)) returns the sum of all the elements of the matrix. Using a separate static class for
the "algorithms" will make this kind of feature more simple to implement in an homogeneous way for matrices and vectors).
Best regards,
Thomas


Mar 18, 2011 at 8:14 AM
Edited Mar 18, 2011 at 8:18 AM

Other ideas for the "static algorithm class" : classical mathematical functions (trigonometric functions, abs, ceil, floor, exp...) that would apply the function on every element of the matrix.
Other idea : implicit methods to cast a Matrix to/from a C# array.

